Search our website
Chronicle E-dition








Burge allows new judge to hear contempt case

Filed by Brad Dicken | The Chronicle-Telegram July 31st, 2007 in Top Stories.
Print this story
Read comments and discuss this story

ELYRIA — Assistant County Prosecutor Tony Cillo could have left the county Justice Center in handcuffs Monday.
Instead, a judge will be appointed to decide if Cillo should be punished for writing in a motion that county Common Pleas Judge James Burge would be deliberately “sandbagging” a death penalty case if he ruled against the state.
Burge, who held Cillo in contempt last week, agreed to let another judge step in after he said Assistant County Prosecutor Scott Serazin made good points when he argued that Burge already had made up his mind that Cillo was in contempt and couldn’t hold a fair hearing.
But another argument made Monday by Serazin — that Cillo’s use of “sandbagging” in the motion opposing joining the death penalty cases of Ruben Rivera and Ronald McCloud, who contest the constitutionality of the state’s lethal injection process, wasn’t disrespectful to the court — wasn’t so well-received.
“What this says here is if I rule against the state of Ohio I’ll be ruling wrongly, doing it deliberately,” Burge said. “… Either rule for the state of Ohio or declare myself unethical.”
Before allowing Serazin to speak, Burge said Cillo, who was unusually subdued as he sat in court, had been heading toward a contempt citation for a long time.
The behavior, Burge said, began when Cillo was arguing against Burge’s decision earlier this year to reduce the sentence of Thomas Holmes, who was serving a 23-year sentence for attacking his wife with a hammer, to six years.
After that hearing, Burge said Cillo told him that “I’d lost my way and my decision to reduce Mr. Holmes’ sentence was nothing less than sheer lunacy.”
Cillo also told Burge’s court reporter Tracy Reiman, Terry Zirzow — Judge Mark Betleski’s civil secretary — and Judge Christopher Rothgery that if Burge wanted to reopen old sentencings, he should start with Dan Urbin, Burge’s bailiff.
Urbin served 60 days in the county jail and spent three years on probation after being convicted in 2001 of selling alcohol beverages without a permit and complicity to unlawful interest in a public contract.
Burge said that even though Urbin has already served his sentence, which can’t be changed, he still took it as a threat.
“The court believes that threat was made to three separate people so it would get to me and straighten me out,” he said.
Reiman, Zirzow and Rothgery said they didn’t take Cillo’s comments as threatening at the time.
“I think he was just blowing off steam,” Rothgery said. “I didn’t take it as a serious threat.”
Burge also said he yelled at Rivera’s attorney Kreig Brusnahan at a previous hearing after Brusnahan lost his cool when Cillo accused him of dishonesty in a dispute over evidence.
After Monday’s hearing, Brusnahan said that Cillo has been disrespectful to him, other attorneys and judges for a long time.
“It’s disrespectful not just to the judge, but to the justice system itself,” Brusnahan said.
County Prosecutor Dennis Will declined to comment on Burge’s decision to have another judge decide if Cillo was in contempt and what sort of punishment he should face. Will said only that his office would deal with the issue at the next hearing.
Administrative Judge Edward Zaleski said he plans to ask a Cuyahoga County judge to oversee further contempt hearings against Cillo.
Also Monday, Burge said that he will continue to move ahead with hearings on whether the lethal injection process in Ohio is cruel and unusual, saying it’s an issue that should be examined before the Rivera and McCloud go to trial.
“The statute says death,” Burge said. “It doesn’t say death plus pain — otherwise the state would be allowed to have someone burned at the stake, drawn-and-quartered or torn apart by dogs.”
Contact Brad Dicken at 329-7147 or bdicken@chroniclet.com.

073107cillo.jpgBruce Bishop / Chronicle
Assistant Lorain County Prosecutor Anthony Cillo listens as Judge James Burge talks about his decision to ask another judge to hear the contempt charge.



Print this story
Report an innappropriate comment


In order to comment, you must agree to our user agreement and discussion guidelines.
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. If you aren't already registered, click here.
If you are registered, click here to log in.
Need help? Email Us.

4 Responses to “Burge allows new judge to hear contempt case”

  1. Mary Gorie says:

    I write in regards to the death penalty. All I have to say is that until one of your family, friends, or neighbors is murdered, raped, or severely beaten to death you will never understand how constitutional the death penalty is.

    These people did not grant their victims the right to die in a peaceful manner. Rapping and brutally beating someone is a long shot from a peaceful death. Not to mention the lives of the people around them who are forever effected because of one person’s actions.

    How is the death penalty cruel and unusual punishment? What was done to the victims of these men was far beyond cruel and unusual.

    Stop delaying the inevitable, we all know they are guilty, the evidence is unrefutable.

    Get on with it.

    (Report comment)

  2. Kim D. says:

    If you want criminals running the county, keep Burge on the bench. If you believe there should be some downside to resorting to criminal behavior, start a recall election for Burge.

    (Report comment)

  3. Tammy says:

    Burge is not saying he doesn’t believe in the death penalty he is say he does not believe in the way it is done. It sounds to me that this lawyer is afraid he is going to lose so he is playing dirty. I do not believe in the death penalty and I have lost a loved one to violence.
    Remember the words of Rev. Bernice King “”Having lost my father and grandmother to gun violence, I will understand the deep hurt and anger felt by the loved ones of those who have been murdered. Yet I can’t accept the judgement that their killers deserve to be executed. This merely perpetuates the tragic, unending cycle of violence that destroys our hope for a decent society.”
    -Rev. Bernice King

    (Report comment)

  4. Ray J says:

    With the county in its current fiscal crisis how can a newly elected judge so blatantly waste the taxpayers money on questions which will ultimately (and already have) be answered by the Ohio Supreme and United States Supreme Courts. Mr. Burges use of his office to push a liberal anti-death penalty campaign at the expense of the Lorain County taxpayers is totally unaccepatable. A judge is supposed to be unbiased in his decisions and handle the cases that come before him in that manner, Mr. Burge has shown us he apparently is incapable of handling his judgeship in this manner. His further waste of our money with his ego driven contempt charge against one of the counties prosecutors shows nothing more than his contempt for the taxpayers of Lorain County and his total disregard and apathy for the position to which he was elected. I agree with Kim D, maybe the people of Lorain County should look into what constitutes a recall of Mr. Burge or better yet a lawsuit against him for fiscal malfesance in office for wasting the taxpayers money to finance his own (and possibly his defense attorney comrades) agenda. This is one man that should NEVER have been elected to the position of judge, he is ultimately going to cast a disparaging shadow over the other Lorain County Judges who in no way deserve it.

    (Report comment)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.