Search our website
Chronicle E-dition








Lawmaker pushes for stronger animal protection

Filed by Associated Press August 11th, 2007 in Local and State.
Print this story
Read comments and discuss this story

CINCINNATI — A veterinarian who doubles as a legislator is pushing for changes in the state’s animal protection laws to keep pets out of the hands of neglectful owners.

Republican Rep. Shawn Webster of Hamilton wants a law to prohibit judges from returning dogs to irresponsible owners. Webster wants to amend legislation that requires a hearing within 21 days if a live animal is held as evidence.

Webster, at the urging of Butler County Auditor Kay Rogers, came forward after two Butler County dogs, named Hope and China, were found with their tethers embedded in their necks.

China spent five months in an animal shelter before a judge ordered the dog be returned to her owner, Otis Clark Jr., who pleaded no contest to animal cruelty and other charges this month.

Anti-tether regulations would have protected both China and Hope. Having such laws on the books lets people know that keeping dogs chained or tied outside is wrong, said Leland Gordon, executive director of the Animal Friends Humane Society in Butler County.

Tied-up dogs often grow short-tempered or become deranged out of frustration and loneliness, Gordon said.
China, a white shepherd mix, was found with a chain collar embedded in her neck in March. She remained in the Trenton shelter for five months until Clark reclaimed her with a copy of Butler County Area Judge Robert Lyons’ order in hand. Clark has been fined $1,000 and must reimburse the shelter more than $1,500 for her surgery and other costs.

Lyons also prohibited Clark from keeping the dog tied outside and is requiring him to read a book on dog care. A call to Lyons’ office on Saturday wasn’t answered. A home phone number could not be found.

Hope, a black Labrador retriever, was found with a cable embedded in her neck. She spent little time in the shelter because her owner, Lauren Spencer of Trenton, signed papers transferring the dog’s ownership to the Animal Friends Humane Society shortly after she was charged with animal cruelty in April. The dog has been adopted by a Hamilton County family, Gordon said.

Spencer was fined $100 in Middletown Municipal Court and was placed on probation for two years. She will spend 30 days in jail if she violates probation. Spencer also was ordered to reimburse the society for the surgery that removed her dog’s cable.
Middletown recently enacted an anti-tether law, prohibiting anyone from leaving a dog on a stationary mooring for more than 12 straight hours.

“If people aren’t informed enough to know they shouldn’t leave a dog tied up constantly, then more places need laws like Middletown’s. They have the most progressive animal laws in the state,” Gordon said.

Webster said he agrees with the general idea that dogs shouldn’t be returned to owners who are convicted of certain offenses. But he added that “there are all kinds of unintentional situations” that result in serious injuries to pets, including escaping and being run over by cars. He questioned whether otherwise responsible owners in those situations should face punishment.  



Print this story
Report an innappropriate comment


In order to comment, you must agree to our user agreement and discussion guidelines.
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. If you aren't already registered, click here.
If you are registered, click here to log in.
Need help? Email Us.

2 Responses to “Lawmaker pushes for stronger animal protection”

  1. Bigfanx aka DJ says:

    Go for it! Rep Webster (R) of Hamilton has the right idea.

    And, I’d say that Butler Co Judge Robert Lyons… doesn’t have the right idea. How lenient can ya be, dude!?

    This man, Clark, allowed the collar to “grow into the dog’s neck”. How long does that take? Well, it doesn’t happen overnight… it takes many months! This case is SEVERE NEGLECT. And your decision to return China to the neglectful “owner” after she’s all healed by the shelter… that’s a very poor decision. You levied only small fines on Clark, allowed China to be returned to him, and mandated that he read a dog care book. Duh? What were you thinking?!

    Good grief… I hope you understand that you’ve returned a live animal to a PROVEN NEGLECTFUL human. Are YOU going to go to Clark’s residence to make sure China isn’t tied up again? Does reading a book, paying fines, guarantee China will live indoors now? How will YOU, Judge Lyons, assure China is treated well and she’s no longer neglected?

    I must say… I think you blew this!
    – DJ —
    St Louis MO

    (Report comment)

  2. Barbara Kordish says:

    Many states have upgraded animal cruelty to a felony.

    When you think about it, the advantages are many. For those heartless monsters who promote animal fights for entertainment and profit, animal cruelty might be an easier crime to prove than racketeering. It would also be an excellent additional felony charge to put these crrminals away longer.

    As for people who alllow horrible things to happen to the animals in their care (collars growing into the animals’ bodies, for instance) and claim ignorance, I’ll bet they become much smarter when faced with a felony charge instead of just a slap on the wrist. Let’s face it - no one is truly that stupid.

    The simple truth is that people commit unspeakable acts against animals because they are cowards and bullies and they know they can get away with it. It is also a fact that serial killers first hone their torture and murder skills on defenseless animals, until they can no longer contain themselves and turn to people. Wouldn’t it be great to identify them and incarcerate them early?

    A civilized society cannot condone or iignore barbaric acts, no matter who the victims may be.

    (Report comment)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.