Ohio historian could face hard time for boulder dig
A
The indictment accuses Shaffer of breaking
“I’m really surprised,” Shaffer said. “It’s not about historic preservation, we all know that. It’s about revenge.”
The rock’s removal triggered a dispute between Shaffer and elected officials in
The rock was once a navigation marker and an attraction for locals who ventured out to carve their names into it, but it hadn’t been seen since the 1920s.
It remained mostly submerged until September, when Shaffer led the crew that pulled it from the river, which separates
The rock has carvings of initials, names and a crude face that some claim is a petroglyph carved by an unknown American Indian.
It was registered as a protected archaeological object with
“What’s important is that all of these things be protected and that the law of
Shaffer, an Ironton,
“It just amazes me that it just couldn’t have been resolved any other way,” he said.
Print this story
Report an inappropriate comment
In order to comment, you must agree to our user agreement and discussion guidelines.
Need help? Email Us.




