Search our website
Chronicle E-dition








Ohio Supreme Court upholds early voting window

Filed by Associated Press September 29th, 2008 in BREAKING, Top Stories.
Print this story
Read comments and discuss this story

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Two courts on Monday upheld a weeklong period in Ohio in which new voters can register and cast an absentee ballot on the same day.

Another court decision was expected later in the day over the early voting window, which begins Tuesday and has become a highly partisan battle in a swing state where President Bush narrowly clinched re-election in 2004.

In a 4-3 decision the Ohio Supreme Court said Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner was correct in her interpretation that voters don’t need to be registered for at least 30 days before receiving an absentee ballot.

Brunner, a Democrat, has been heavily criticized by Republicans who have said she interpreted the same-day registration and voting window to benefit her own party.

In another decision, U.S. District Judge James Gwin in Cleveland issued a temporary restraining order forcing Madison County to follow Brunner’s instructions on early voting. The county had said it was going to follow the advice of its county prosecutor and not allow same-day voting during the six-day window that runs through Oct. 6.

The Ohio Supreme Court has six Republicans and one Democrat. Gwin was appointed to the bench by former President Bill Clinton.

In the day’s last courtroom battle, the Ohio Republican Party has filed a statewide challenge in federal court in Columbus before a judge appointed by former President Ronald Reagan.

The ruling by the Ohio Supreme Court a was loss for two voters who had sued and were backed by the state GOP. Republicans argue that Ohio law requires voters to have been registered for at least 30 days before they can cast an absentee ballot and that the law doesn’t allow same-day registration and voting.

But Brunner interpreted the law correctly, Gwin said in his ruling.

“We believed all along the law was very clear,” said Carrie Davis, a staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, which brought the case against Madison County, west of Columbus.

The disputed voting window results from an overlap between Tuesday’s beginning of absentee voting 35 days before Election Day, and the Oct. 6 end of voter registration period.

“The Republicans’ cynical 11th-hour ploy to disenfranchise Ohio voters has been soundly rejected in federal court,” said Ohio Democratic Party Chairman Chris Redfern.

Ohio Republican Party spokesman John McClelland said the party was declining comment until all three court rulings had come in.

Democrat Barack Obama’s campaign has extensive plans to try to get college students across the state to register and vote during the window. Other groups, including the Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, have plans to drive the homeless, low-income and minority voters to the polls during the window.

And despite the Republican legal action against the window, John McCain’s campaign has encouraged voters to prepare for it.

Republicans have said they were concerned that providing an absentee ballot to a voter before checking whether the registration was valid would open the door to voter fraud.

Brunner has instructed election officials to segregate the ballots cast by those who registered on the same day and verify the registration information before those ballots are counted on Nov. 4.

 



Print this story
Report an innappropriate comment


In order to comment, you must agree to our user agreement and discussion guidelines.
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. If you aren't already registered, click here.
If you are registered, click here to log in.
Need help? Email Us.

5 Responses to “Ohio Supreme Court upholds early voting window”

  1. THHiggie says:

    Talk about voter fraud and the stupidity of election officials, the Cuyahoga Elections folks sent absentee voter applications to 66,000 people who don’t even live in the county. They have absolutely no idea who lives in the county and who is eligible to vote. They don’t care either, just as long as they vote Democrat.

    (Report comment)

  2. D.Ezell says:

    Brunner’s interpretation creates an illegal loophole in the state law to advance same-day registration and voting … which was never a consideration when the General Assembly passed the law.
    DemoRATS are UNETHICALLY taking advantage of this loophole.

    (Report comment)

  3. mae says:

    Will these same-day votes be held and verified the same as provisional ballots?

    (Report comment)

  4. JSalvatore says:

    Both Parties failed us…. they banks were stupid, the real estate agents were stupid in trying to fianance folks who they know for a fact would not be able to afford the mortgage if the rates went up with the tricky loans to make a sale…. Next time LOW COMMISISONS TO REAL ESTATE AGENTS!

    (Report comment)

  5. JSalvatore says:

    oops… put it in the wrong story…..lol

    (Report comment)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.