November 28, 2014

Elyria
Cloudy
27°F
test

Judge seeks input on whether to continue case against accused killer

Bobbie New, left, listens during a hearing in Judge John Miraldi’s court Monday in the Lorain County Justice Center. STEVE MANHEIM / CHRONICLE

Bobbie New, left, listens during a hearing in Judge John Miraldi’s court Monday in the Lorain County Justice Center. STEVE MANHEIM / CHRONICLE

ELYRIA — Lorain County Common Pleas Judge John Miraldi has agreed to reconsider his decision to allow the murder case against accused killer Bobbie New to proceed.

During a hearing Monday, Miraldi said he wanted to hear from both prosecutors and defense lawyers on whether there should be a balancing test to determine whether New would receive a fair trial because of the delay in bringing charges against him.

New was indicted in 2011 for the slaying of 45-year-old Dorothy Spencer, who was found beaten and shot in her Camden Township trailer on March 14, 1976. She died from her injuries three days later.

Although New was a suspect in the 1970s, the case against him had gone cold until 2010, when his nephew, Perry Strader, contacted Lorain County sheriff’s deputies and reported that he and his parents helped cover up his uncle’s involvement in killing Spencer.

County Common Pleas Judge James Burge ruled in 2012 that New’s right to a fair trial had been compromised by passage of time, although he personally believed New was guilty. The 9th District Court of Appeals later overturned that decision and Burge removed himself from the case.

Miraldi had ruled that based on the appeals court decision, prosecutors had been able to justify the delay in charging New.

Miraldi said during Monday’s hearing that the appeals court decision concluded that both the defense and prosecution were affected by the delay. Several witnesses in the case, including Strader’s parents, have since died.

But attorneys for New asked Miraldi to reconsider, arguing that there needs to be an examination of whether the delay outweighs the negative impact on New’s right to a fair trial.

Assistant County Prosecutor Sherry Glass argued that wasn’t necessary because of the appeals court decision.

“There’s no need for a balancing test because the analysis already took place,” she said.

Miraldi ordered both sides to write up documents detailing their arguments before he makes a final decision.

Contact Brad Dicken at 329-7147 or bdicken@chroniclet.com. Follow him on Twitter @BradDickenCT.


  • golfingirl

    At the very least, his nephew should be sent away for lying…if he is still living.

    • luvmytoaster

      Why do you think the nephew is lying? And yes, he is still living.

      • golfingirl

        “Perry Strader, contacted Lorain County sheriff’s deputies and reported that he and his parents helped cover up his uncle’s involvement in killing Spencer.”

        He denied any involvement at the time of the crime.

        His change of heart was accompanied by a change in his story.

        • luvmytoaster

          “Burge concluded that the failure of investigators to interview Perry Strader in the 1970s was a mistake that led to the unfair delay in New being charged with murder. He also wrote in his decision that the two witnesses who could counteract the testimony of Perry Strader, his parents, were both deceased.”

          Read the related post: “Appeals court reinstates Bobbie New’s murder charge.”

          I for one believe Mr. Straders story.

          • golfingirl

            Did not know that. Thanks for pointing it out.

            After the murder:

            “New and the nephew (Perry Strader) went out to look for the gun — believed to a .38-caliber snub-nosed revolver that has never been found — that New had tossed somewhere on Quarry Road.”

            Barker and county Prosecutor Dennis Will said:

            “…that although Strader and her also-deceased husband, Ezra Strader, could have faced perjury charges for their testimony to a county grand jury in the 1970s, it’s unlikely anyone still living would be charged in the case…”

            He must have lied to the Grand Jury.

          • luvmytoaster

            I believe per his (Strader) previous statements that he was trying to protect his family, he was a teenager at the time. Some reports state that they believe that his parents lied when questioned but they have since deceased – why bring it up after all these years if it’s not going to vindicate anyone?

            I knew Mr. Strader in the late 80′s and early 90′s. I just don’t see how he would benefit unless he was telling the truth. Maybe I’m wrong.

            Mr. New was considered a suspect all along by the authorities.

          • golfingirl

            I believe him now. I do think he is telling the truth.

          • luvmytoaster

            You can also search for “Judge: Delay in murder case was not justified” that states “Even after Zula Strader testified before the grand jury that Perry lived at her home and was an adult high school student, detectives never bothered to interview him,” Burge wrote.

            Clearly this was a botched investigation…..